Monday, May 5, 2008

On Soccer in America - Part 1

What the people who suggest “soccer will never be popular in the US” are trying to say is, “soccer as a professional spectator sport will never be popular in the US”. Near term - probably, long term - maybe, never - unlikely. What most conscious people have known for about a decade or so now is that football is the most popular participation team sport (approx. 18 million) in the US and the numbers are trending upward.

You may not find a statistical correlation between participation and spectatorship in the US; but overall the game makes more sense to more Americans than ever.
The popular spectator US sports benefit from a long and storied social and cultural history that football in the states just does not have – i.e., peanuts at the ballpark, tailgate and Superbowl parties, binge drinking at your NCAA game, saturated television coverage and the commercials to prop it up, etc.

As those of us who grew up playing in the States in the 70s and 80s (and continue in adult leagues all over the US) become the coaches of our own children that play, the first challenge, the generational understanding gap, gets more and more narrow. We can all sit at the pub and enjoy a match, confident we understand exactly what to look for. Add to that unprecedented access via cable and internet to great leagues and great players all over the world and decent leagues in the US, and the sport that my father (and mother) didn’t even have the chance to play, may grow in cultural significance, albeit slowly. Finally, factor in the influence of immigration on US culture and you begin to see some serious handwriting on the wall.

If marketing revenue is a predictor of success, then the nature of the game itself may keep it from ever realizing the commercial success of the traditional US spectator sport. Because soccer is two 45 minute uninterrupted halves with a short half time break – there is very little time for traditional commercial advertising to have an influence. There will never be a two minute warning or a time out so downtime is kept at a minimum. However, the same tools that bring international sport in to the American living room are at least partially responsible for the demise of traditional commercial advertising in US sport – with the obvious exception of the Superbowl and the NCAA tournament. Soccer revenue for merchants is in sponsorships not commercials – the fan experience is the game itself, which lends itself nicely to the new media model that cuts commercials out altogether (e.g., Tivo).

So if sporting “success” in the States is defined by dollars, then I wouldn’t hold out for soccer being able to compete with the other sports – not yet – it’s not built for unlimited beer and pretzel breaks. But most football fans don’t use the event as an excuse to socialize anyway – take your eye off the pitch for a second and you may miss the play of the match (which may or may not result in a goal by the way.) With that in mind however; tournaments, teams, and leagues all over the world are not only spectacularly popular, but fiscally lucrative.

In conclusion, for all the naysayers who insist the game will never arrive in the States, look at the numbers and not the dollars. You will discover that the beautiful game has been here for quite a while. 18,000,000 players and growing, can’t be wrong.

On Diving - Part 2

To those who say diving is a world wide problem:

Anecdotal Evidence but...I was a part of Tuggeranong Football Club last year and saw no evidence of diving week after week - nor did I see it in the A League matches I caught on television.

Now, being back in the US and playing every weekend and watching a great many EPL matches and a few MLS matches, I rarely see diving and when you do see it (refernce Nani's actual headbutt and then faked retaliation against Lucas Neil on the weekend) - the divers are lambasted by the fans and the press. (not only did he get a red card for that stunt - but he also got a 3 match ban)

So I'm not sure what football people are tuning in to...maybe it still happens a lot in Serie A or BWINLIGA; but from my actual experience - I hear a lot bandwagon haters who can't back up rampant diving claims with real data.

It should be noted that casual observers should not mistake players going to ground on contact as diving - as any athlete knows, it takes very little contact to bring someone down when they are running at full speed concentrating on a ball at their feet.

So maybe some people quit on the game too easily...if they truly loved football, they should play it to their own standard, hold others to that standard, and let the unscrupulous wallow in their own shiat and be properly hated by lovers of the game.

On Diving - Part 1

To those who say "diving" is rampant in football:

Look, diving in football is a sub culture that is respected by almost no one. If you were to flick on FSC or Setanta to watch Newcastle vs. Chelsea on 5 May- you would notice that every time Drogba gets the ball, he is booed enormously - a legacy of his diving history.

The point is, the beauty and excitement of the game far out way the subculture of theatrics which I believe you'll find in a great many sports. Off the top of my head I'd say that list might include:
  • charges, dives, intentional fouls in basketball,
  • offensive/defensive interference, intentional grounding, etc. in American football (although the inordinate amount of rules, referees, and video surveillance used to police the rules have also paralyzed the game in the process),
  • baseball catchers moving his glove in to the strike zone to trick umpires in baseball,
  • tennis players known for arguing with judges,
  • fighting in ice hockey, etc.